Wednesday 12 June 2013

Laura McFarlan - Conflict Diamonds


Conflict Diamonds 


 Diamonds, a girl’s best friend. But would they still be your best friend if you knew how much blood was shed to get there.  First discovered in African in 1867 and since then they have been the source of pain and suffering all through Africa. They are used to fund rebel armies from five African countries. Angola, Sierra Leone, Cote d’Ivoire, Liberia and The Congo. These rebel armies kill, amputate and enslave civilians for their own purposes. (Hoyt)
Starting in the early 1990’s Sierra Leone became the poster child for conflict that conflict diamonds fund. The Revolutionary United Front (RUF) began its campaign in 1991 before the government elections, lead by Foday Sankoh they saw the government weak and unstable. Each person in the country of Sierra Leone has to figure print in order to vote, the RUF then started what they called a campaign of amputation, cutting of people hands so they could not vote. Taking away the livelihood of thousands of people who make a living off of farming.  After the course of 11 years the RUF had 90% of all diamond mines in Sierra Leone under their control. They used child soldiers and stole people from their homes to work of them.  In 2000 the RUF signed a peace treaty; however they broke it after 6 months. Finally in 2002 the UN, British and Guinean forces entered the conflict and brought the war to an end.

(Mukwazh, Miners dig for diamonds in Zimbabwe's Marange fields)
During the peak of the conflict diamond funded wars more than 500,000 people in Sierra Leone were displaced and more than 2 million people fled from the country. Child soldiers were drugged and brain washed into fighting for a cause they had a bias knowledge on. The profits from the diamond industry directly funded the genocide the occurred in Sierra Leone and similar events in Cote d’Ivoire and Liberia. It is estimated that more than conflict diamonds have resulted in the deaths of over 4 million people. Thousands of hectares of forest space was destroyed in the wars and villages burnt to the ground.
(Hondors, Workers pan for diamonds at a government-run mine in Sierra Leone. Al Qaeda is known to have made millions of dollars from the sale of diamonds mined illegally by the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in Sierra Leone.)

In 2003 the Kimberly Process Certification Scheme was established, it is an international delegation ensuring the fair trade of diamonds. More than 70 countries participate in the certification scheme. The makes sure that the diamonds entering the trade are legitimate. (Vermeulem) By tracing back where the diamond was found it be determined in the diamond is legitimate or not.  The process claims that 99.8 percent of the diamonds that go through the certification are conflict free. However in 2011 Global Witness, an organization that worked on the Kimberley Process left as the Kimberley Process refused to change as it had become increasingly outdated and did not address the emerging ways of smuggling conflict diamonds into the “legitimate” diamond trade.( Conflict diamonds) This was after one of the biggest loop holes in the Kimberly Process was discovered. The Kimberly Process defines a conflict diamond as a diamond that is sold by rebel groups to wage war on a government. (Nicolson) This does not prevent governments in Zimbabwe from committing abuse and terror in order to get their diamonds. The Kimberly Process has not changed its legislation yet as most conflict diamond related wars have ended and now remains to monitor the diamond trade. And in 2006 the United States release a report saying that over 23 million dollars’ worth of conflict diamonds from Côte D'Ivoire were smuggled into Ghana.

                Even though Africa produced more than 60 percent of the world’s diamonds there are still other options and not all African diamond procuring countries are corrupt. Botswana has one of the fastest growing economies and it’s because of diamonds. Almost fifty percent of the countries revenue comes from conflict free diamonds. (Roach)  Canada has also recently become one of the front runners in the developed world that produces legitimate diamonds, which might come at a higher price. Diamonds manufactured in labs are not quite at gem quality yet, however they can be used for industrial purposes.  Such as cutting tools. (Hoyt)
                     
                It is easy to avoid conflict diamonds if you know the right questions to ask when buying the gems. When buying diamonds all you have to do is ask three simple questions. Ask what the companies policy on conflict diamonds is, from what country are your companies diamonds exported from and if the companies can guarantee in writing that the supplier that gave you the diamond you are asking for is conflict free. If the company cannot answer these simple questions then you cannot be sure that the diamond is conflict free, then simply take your business else were. (Hoyt) Or try asking for a diamond produced in Canada or Australia where you know that the diamond did not shed any blood the get on your ring.



6 comments:

  1. Gillian - WOW! i never knew that there were that many conflict diamonds. I am glad that there were legislations trying to stop these conflict diamonds, but its sad to hear that this is still happening in the world.

    do you think its possible that the government could put in place a new legislation with little to no possibilities for loop holes?? so that we can stop these conflict diamonds?

    Thank you for all of your information, but i wish i had more information about the side of the USA, what the rest of the world thinks about this conflict. Maybe a point of view from the USA's government. so we can understand both sides of the conflict.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thea- Omg this is such an interesting topic! I never knew that this was such an issue and is even going on today.I wonder if there are less conflict diamonds now that people know about the issue. I wish I had more information on this so I could make sure the diamonds are buy are conflict free.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Emma Turner -
    Great blog Laura! I love how much information and facts you had. It's great to hear that most of the diamonds that were financially aiding some of the wars have ended though I'm sure there's still families in these countries who still are affected by these wars. Thanks for the tips on how to buy any future diamonds!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cabot - Wowzers! Laura you've done it again. I didn't know that Canada has actually become a front runner in legitimate diamonds. Do you think in the future diamonds from countries such as Canada, and lab manufactured diamonds could eliminate conflict diamonds all together? I also would like some more information on the companies that are buying these cheaper diamonds to sell for more profit, where do they stand publicly on the issues of blood diamonds?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Laura McFarlan - wow guys, thanks for all the comments. Gillian - I think that it is totally possible that if the Kimberly Process was to up date it's qualification process then it would not have as many loophols. But the problem is that people will always find new ways to smuggle diamonds in. If the Kimberly Process continued to change as the time did then it would be much harder for the smugglers.

    As for the US view and the world. There are NGO's that have started public programs trying to inform people on the topic more, because for the most part people dont know or dont care. The movie Blood Diamond was a great tool used to get people more involved in the issue, even after the KP had been put in place. People keep demanding diamonds for the weddings and earring so they still keep funding the issue. But it's still like that with alot of other materials. Just ask questions about where your products are coming from and it will be easier to avoid. If the consumer demands conflict free diamonds then the consumer will get what they want.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Laura McFarlan - Well Cabot. I think there could be a possible future in Canada and lab manufactured diamonds, but it's still a developing industry in Canada an d as the African countries develop then hopeful we should see a decrease in conflict diamonds. As people become happier with there government and less likely to rebel, and fight for the diamonds.
    As for companies the diamonds aren't always cheaper. The largest diamond company in the world; that owns more than 40 percent of the diamond industry De Beers says that 100 percent of their diamonds are conflict free. But that can never be for sure because of the loopholes in the KP.

    ReplyDelete